On Tue, May 7, 2019 at 9:44 AM Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > > Amit Kapila <akap...@postgresql.org> writes: > > Revert "Avoid the creation of the free space map for small heap relations". > > Shouldn't there be a catversion bump in this? I doubt that an existing > v12 DB (with some missing FSM files) is going to work with the updated > backend. >
Won't the next vacuum run will create the FSM? There is some performance loss, but shouldn't be big. > Also, will pg_upgrade work across that boundary? > I haven't tried it. What is your worry? -- With Regards, Amit Kapila. EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com