Amit Kapila <amit.kapil...@gmail.com> writes: > On Tue, May 7, 2019 at 9:44 AM Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> Shouldn't there be a catversion bump in this?
> Won't the next vacuum run will create the FSM?
If that's true, and if we don't throw any errors meanwhile, it's fine.
I'm just worried that that's an untested scenario.
regards, tom lane
