On Tue, Feb 4, 2020 at 9:42 AM Peter Geoghegan <p...@bowt.ie> wrote: > Can we reuse _bt_end_parallel() this time around? It would be easy to > add a "bool wait" argument to _bt_end_parallel(). All existing callers > would pass true, but when not using parallelism due to the new DSM > segment check we'd pass false.
Hmm. I see why you didn't do it that way -- we don't quite have the variables set up in the way that _bt_end_parallel() expects them. This looks good, then. -- Peter Geoghegan
