On Wed, Feb 5, 2020 at 6:47 AM Peter Geoghegan <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Feb 4, 2020 at 9:42 AM Peter Geoghegan <[email protected]> wrote: > > Can we reuse _bt_end_parallel() this time around? It would be easy to > > add a "bool wait" argument to _bt_end_parallel(). All existing callers > > would pass true, but when not using parallelism due to the new DSM > > segment check we'd pass false. > > Hmm. I see why you didn't do it that way -- we don't quite have the > variables set up in the way that _bt_end_parallel() expects them. > > This looks good, then.
Thanks. Pushed.
