On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 9:03 AM Tom Lane <[email protected]> wrote: > Agreed, just keep it as a no-op. Not sure whether there should be > a documentation entry for it, but I bet we get questions if there > isn't.
I won't be adding back the psql completion stuff. Why can't adding back the reloption have the desired effect of avoiding issues with pg_upgrade and pg_restore, while also leaving the reloption practically invisible to users? Naturally I would prefer to keep cruft about an inert reloption out of the documentation. -- Peter Geoghegan
