On Mon, Apr 05, 2021 at 06:57:47PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> No, I bet it is with "now defines a SQL query".  That means there's
> something to be stuffed down the pipe.
> 
> I find I can reproduce this pretty reliably on slower machines
> here, if you want me to dig into it more carefully.

Now that I think about it, another thing that has changed in this code
is the fact that it calls PostgresNode::psql with a result array
rather than just the error result, still I don't see how this would
have an impact?  If you are right, it would be easy to bypass this
error with a change in the connect routines to be able to pass down
undefined queries rather than filling in a default one.  But that does
not feel like the root of it.
--
Michael

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to