> On Oct 29, 2024, at 5:41 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>
> Andrew Dunstan <and...@dunslane.net> writes:
>> Crake doesn't seem to like this for cross version upgrade, and the diff
>> looks rather odd:
>
> Oh, that's annoying. I forgot to mention the side-effects that 2024b
> had on PST8PDT and other SysV-derived timezones (probably because Paul
> Eggert avoided mentioning that in his release notes ... thanks for
> nothing Paul). What we've got there is that sufficiently old
> timestamps (pre 1890 or so) are now interpreted as local mean solar
> time for Los Angeles rather than exactly UTC-8.
>
> I would expect that the upgrade tests would pass now for upgrades
> from v12 or later, thanks to b8ea0f675 et al, but I'm not real
> sure what to do about testing the out-of-support branches. Should
> we back-patch b8ea0f675 as far down as 9.2?
>
>
Or fix/remove the problem rows in AdjustUpgrade.pm I guess
Cheers
Andrew
