On Wed, Oct 30, 2024 at 4:53 PM Andrew Dunstan <and...@dunslane.net> wrote:
> > > On Wed, Oct 30, 2024 at 4:33 PM Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > >> Andrew Dunstan <and...@dunslane.net> writes: >> > On Wed, Oct 30, 2024 at 11:00 AM Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> >> I went to try to test this locally, and got nowhere, because: >> >> old cluster does not use data checksums but the new one does >> >> Failure, exiting >> >> What have you done to get around that on crake? >> >> > I did this: >> > >> https://github.com/PGBuildFarm/client-code/commit/2ef5acefe5e6eee761ea2ee010c3d14e2d8fab60 >> >> Ah, thanks. I installed that locally, and got >> >> ... >> tester:HEAD [16:25:31] saving files for cross-version upgrade >> check >> tester:HEAD [16:25:33] checking upgrade from REL9_2_STABLE to >> HEAD ... >> tester:HEAD [16:25:53] checking upgrade from REL_11_STABLE to >> HEAD ... >> tester:HEAD [16:26:31] checking upgrade from REL_12_STABLE to >> HEAD ... >> tester:HEAD [16:27:08] checking upgrade from REL_13_STABLE to >> HEAD ... >> tester:HEAD [16:27:46] checking upgrade from REL_14_STABLE to >> HEAD ... >> tester:HEAD [16:28:26] checking upgrade from REL_15_STABLE to >> HEAD ... >> tester:HEAD [16:29:05] checking upgrade from REL_16_STABLE to >> HEAD ... >> tester:HEAD [16:29:47] checking upgrade from HEAD to HEAD ... >> tester:HEAD [16:30:32] running make ecpg check ... >> tester:HEAD [16:30:40] OK >> >> (This client instance doesn't have back-branch runs for v9.3--v10.) >> >> So now I'm even more confused. Why does it work here and not there? >> I can't think of any buildfarm options that would affect this. >> >> > > My 9.2 saved instance is quite old ... Nov 2018. > > But I don't see why that should affect it, so I'm confused too. > > Further data point - drongo and fairywren are not showing this issue. cheers andrew
