On Fri, Jan 24, 2025 at 12:19 PM Michael Paquier <mich...@paquier.xyz> wrote: > > Hi Alvaro. > > On Thu, Jan 23, 2025 at 02:59:38PM +0000, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > > Allow NOT VALID foreign key constraints on partitioned tables > > > > This feature was intentionally omitted when FKs were first implemented > > for partitioned tables, and had been requested a few times; the > > usefulness is clear. > > > > Validation can happen for each partition individually, which is useful > > to contain the number of locks held and the duration; or it can be > > executed for the partitioning hierarchy as a single command, which > > validates all child constraints that haven't been validated already. > > > > This is also useful to implement NOT ENFORCED constraints on top. > > morepork at [1] is telling that these two queries are missing an ORDER > BY to ensure a proper ordering of the output generated: > +-- Constraint will be invalid. > +SELECT conname, convalidated FROM pg_constraint WHERE conrelid = > 'fk_notpartitioned_fk'::regclass; > [...] > +-- All constraints are now valid. > +SELECT conname, convalidated FROM pg_constraint WHERE conrelid = > 'fk_notpartitioned_fk'::regclass; > > [1]: > https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=morepork&dt=2025-01-23%2023%3A35%3A57 >
Thanks for reporting. I’ve posted the patch in the other thread [1]. 1] http://postgr.es/m/caaj_b974u3vvf-qgwfyz73dfhqyfjp9tomuixr2kp8kvcjt...@mail.gmail.com Regards, Amul