Andrew Dunstan <and...@dunslane.net> writes:
> On 2025-02-22 Sa 9:20 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I'm not really seeing a better answer than hacking the comparison
>> rules to ignore the relallvisible difference for these tables.
>> That's darn ugly, and I suspect the implementation will be messy,
>> but do we have another way?
> Having slept on it I can't see anything better. It's only for very old
> branches, and nothing is really going wrong here, so ignoring the
> difference seems quite reasonable.
Agreed, and done.
regards, tom lane
