> After a bit of fooling around I found that using an explicit \n > instead of ^ fixes it. Not the world's most idiomatic regex, > but it'll do. Will push the attached shortly.
I can also confirm this works as expected, although I feel my suggested expression [0] is easier to understand, but I have no strong opinion either way. Regards, -- Sami [0] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAA5RZ0tz-AibaxVF1NnNMcMEmwut%2Bkn%3Dk%3DxG2XmDN9d6kv2-%3Dg%40mail.gmail.com