On 30.04.25 13:56, David Rowley wrote:
On Wed, 30 Apr 2025 at 23:43, David Rowley <dgrowle...@gmail.com> wrote:
memcpy() would make more sense IMO, since the length is
known already. I'm fine with either, however.
In case you're looking for inspiration on a standard to follow,
commits such as 586dd5d6a did seem to favour memcpy() when the length
was known and only use strlcpy() when it wasn't.
It looks like the memcpy() uses in that commit are for cases where we
don't want/need the null terminator.
I think it's best in general to use str* for strings and mem* for
not-strings. That's easier to read and also better for static analyzers
etc.
