On Sun, 7 Sep 2003, Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> Tom Lane wrote: > >>> I thought the consensus of the discussion was that this was not > >>> necessary. It sure doesn't strike me as a good idea. > > > Also, keep in mind that in the end most folks will be building under > > MinGW using a release tarball, that has those output files. We haven't > > gotten a MinGW release yet, so they have to build all the stuff. > > Well, that's a fair argument, but why don't you get Marc to set up > nightly snapshots for the WIN32_DEV branch? That only costs cycles > in the short term. Polluting CVS with updates to derived files will > cost us CVS storage forever. Easy enough, and done ... ftp://ftp.postgresql.org/pub/win32_dev will have it run nighty like the regular snapshot ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org
