Marc G. Fournier wrote: > > > On Sun, 7 Sep 2003, Tom Lane wrote: > > > Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > >> Tom Lane wrote: > > >>> I thought the consensus of the discussion was that this was not > > >>> necessary. It sure doesn't strike me as a good idea. > > > > > Also, keep in mind that in the end most folks will be building under > > > MinGW using a release tarball, that has those output files. We haven't > > > gotten a MinGW release yet, so they have to build all the stuff. > > > > Well, that's a fair argument, but why don't you get Marc to set up > > nightly snapshots for the WIN32_DEV branch? That only costs cycles > > in the short term. Polluting CVS with updates to derived files will > > cost us CVS storage forever. > > Easy enough, and done ... > > ftp://ftp.postgresql.org/pub/win32_dev > > will have it run nighty like the regular snapshot
Oh, that's nice. I put it on my web site so people don't need CVS installed. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
