> -----Original Message----- > From: Tom Lane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > "Hiroshi Inoue" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> I committed the fixes a few minutes ago. I now actually > believe that > >> reindexing system tables works ;-) ... hopefully Hiroshi does too. > > > I don't see your commit message yet. > > CVS reports to the committers list seem to be wedged this > afternoon :-(. > I already complained to Marc about it. But in the meantime > here is the > cvs2cl entry: > > Remove the 'index deactivation' code, since it provides > no useful > protection in the shared- index case.
Seems a funny reason to me. Well, do you also remove reltuples or relpages from pg_class ? As I already mentioned, I don't love the ReindexProcessing global flag from the first. For example, it's not thread-safe. > > Is it wrong to believe I have a right to conitune the discussion ? > > Not at all, but I already waited two days for your response, > and I can't > put development on hold indefinitely. I've spent a pretty much time only to put back your change. What I've got until now was just a temporary neutral state. It's not a neutral state now again. Should I be satisfied with it ? regards, Hiroshi Inoue ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend
