> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bruce Momjian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> 
> Hiroshi Inoue wrote:
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Tom Lane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> > > 
> > > "Hiroshi Inoue" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > >> From: Tom Lane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > >> Why?  As far as I know, the modified code does 
> everything you want.
> > > 
> > > > How do you what I want ?
> > > 
> > > If you aren't going to tell me, I guess I won't know :-(. 
>  It seems
> > > like you want to turn this into some kind of personal issue.
> > 
> > Personal issue ? 
> > Are you going to dodge the issue ?
> 
> Hiroshi, Tom already apologized for doing this without prior 
> discussion.

Though there has been no discussion like discussion on this
item between Tom and me, his code is already there. 
Is it reasonbale ? As I already mentioned many many times
putting back his change should have been the first thing but
it wasn't.

regards,
Hiroshi Inoue


---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster

Reply via email to