"Bruce Momjian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> > > On Tue, 2008-03-18 at 03:59 +0000, Bruce Momjian wrote: >> > > > * Speed WAL recovery by allowing more than one page to be prefetched >> > > > >> > > > This involves having a separate process that can be told which pages >> > > > the recovery process will need in the near future. > > Are you reading the same thread I am? See: > > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2008-02/msg01301.php
I don't think there's any consensus for the approach you describe above. If anything it seemed the least objectionable form was something involving posix_fadvise or libaio. Tom did wave us off from Simon's approach on the basis of it being hard to test and Heikki seemed to be agreeing on the basis that it would be better to reuse infrastructure useful in other cases as well. So I guess that's some kind of consensus... of two. -- Gregory Stark EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com Ask me about EnterpriseDB's 24x7 Postgres support! -- Sent via pgsql-committers mailing list ([email protected]) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-committers
