Gregory Stark wrote: > "Bruce Momjian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > >> > > On Tue, 2008-03-18 at 03:59 +0000, Bruce Momjian wrote: > >> > > > * Speed WAL recovery by allowing more than one page to be prefetched > >> > > > > >> > > > This involves having a separate process that can be told which > >> > > > pages > >> > > > the recovery process will need in the near future. > > > > Are you reading the same thread I am? See: > > > > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2008-02/msg01301.php > > I don't think there's any consensus for the approach you describe above. If > anything it seemed the least objectionable form was something involving > posix_fadvise or libaio. > > Tom did wave us off from Simon's approach on the basis of it being hard to > test and Heikki seemed to be agreeing on the basis that it would be better to > reuse infrastructure useful in other cases as well. So I guess that's some > kind of consensus... of two.
Yep, that was my analysis too. -- Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://postgres.enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. + -- Sent via pgsql-committers mailing list ([email protected]) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-committers
