On 24 January 2011 13:45, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 8:18 AM, Thom Brown <t...@linux.com> wrote: >> On 24 January 2011 03:52, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 9:39 PM, Thom Brown <t...@linux.com> wrote: >>>> There are quite a few sentences which I'm not sure how to correct as I >>>> don't know how they're supposed to read. But I've put together a >>>> patch to correct some of the typos and grammar. There's a lot I >>>> haven't yet gone through though. >>> >>> Thanks. I just committed a bunch of cleanup, including whatever of >>> your patch I didn't rewrite along the way. If you want to take >>> another crack at it now I'd be most grateful... >> >> Okay, an additional patch is attached. > > Committed with a bit of further hacking. Probably still needs more > work - in particular, I think there are probably some bits in here > that should use <caution> or <example>, and there's still some awkward > phrasing.
I noticed I introduced a couple of grammatical errors of my own, which you've fortunately fixed. Yes, it still needs work, and I could see certain paragraphs needed rephrasing, but I wasn't confident enough about what they were trying to say to do so. -- Thom Brown Twitter: @darkixion IRC (freenode): dark_ixion Registered Linux user: #516935 -- Sent via pgsql-committers mailing list (pgsql-committers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-committers
