On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 10:42 PM, Andrew Dunstan <and...@dunslane.net> wrote: > Which is another way of doing it, I guess. I'm not sure why the usual way > wasn't adopted there. Perhaps it was simply forgotten, it is done like that since pg_upgrade a couple of years back with c2e9b2f. -- Michael
-- Sent via pgsql-committers mailing list (pgsql-committers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-committers