On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 10:54:04PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote: > On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 10:42 PM, Andrew Dunstan <and...@dunslane.net> wrote: > > Which is another way of doing it, I guess. I'm not sure why the usual way > > wasn't adopted there. > Perhaps it was simply forgotten, it is done like that since pg_upgrade > a couple of years back with c2e9b2f.
Yes, I think Sleep() was left over from when pg_upgrade was not in contrib. I have committed a patch to use pg_usleep(). Thanks. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + Everyone has their own god. + -- Sent via pgsql-committers mailing list (pgsql-committers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-committers
