Robert Haas <[email protected]> writes:
> On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 2:38 PM, Tom Lane <[email protected]> wrote:
>> The makefile changes in this do not look right to me.  Files that are
>> meant to be shipped in the tarball should be removed by make
>> maintainer-clean, not an ordinary "make clean" which is what the committed
>> patch appears to do.  Otherwise, a tarball user without bison installed
>> would be cut off at the knees if he did "make clean" or "make distclean";
>> but those operations are not supposed to remove files that were in the
>> tarball.

> Hmm, yeah.  Also, it appears that the exprscan.h file doesn't actually
> get (or need to be) generated here.  So I think we need something like
> the attached.

Looks OK to me.

                        regards, tom lane


-- 
Sent via pgsql-committers mailing list ([email protected])
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-committers

Reply via email to