On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 10:19:51AM -0400, Robert Haas wrote: > On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 10:09 AM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > > Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: > >> On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 10:00 AM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > >>> I'm going to revert that commit in HEAD shortly, unless Alvaro pops > >>> up and promises a fix PDQ. Or you could do the same. > > > >> I was thinking of changing master to look like the 9.4 version. > > > > [ shrug... ] IMO, a quick "git revert" is less work and leaves a cleaner > > state for Alvaro to apply whatever final solution he settles on. > > But do what you wish. > > OK, I've just reverted it.
Can I ask about the logic of why this bug fix was backpatched, or is that clear to everyone but me. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + Everyone has their own god. + -- Sent via pgsql-committers mailing list (pgsql-committers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-committers
