On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 10:57 AM, Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> wrote: > Uh, I didn't see a huge amount of discussion, but I guess it is > sufficient: > > > http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/20150109191551.ga32...@fetter.org#20150109191551.ga32...@fetter.org
There are at least a dozen messages on that thread that are entirely dedicated to whether this should be back-patched. How much discussion did you want? Now, mind you, my view did not prevail, so I can't be completely happy with the outcome, but I was in the minority. At least the version that broke essentially the entire build-farm only went into master, so that's something. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-committers mailing list (pgsql-committers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-committers
