On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 10:57 AM, Bruce Momjian <[email protected]> wrote: > Uh, I didn't see a huge amount of discussion, but I guess it is > sufficient: > > > http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/[email protected]#[email protected]
There are at least a dozen messages on that thread that are entirely dedicated to whether this should be back-patched. How much discussion did you want? Now, mind you, my view did not prevail, so I can't be completely happy with the outcome, but I was in the minority. At least the version that broke essentially the entire build-farm only went into master, so that's something. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-committers mailing list ([email protected]) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-committers
