Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes:
> On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 4:30 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> This really should have involved a catversion bump. But we just
>> had one earlier today, so in practice it might not matter.
> Oh, because of stored rules using the old RangeTblEntry serialization
> format? Sorry, I totally missed that.
Yeah, exactly. In practice I'm not sure a stored rule/view could contain
an RTE_NAMEDTUPLESTORE RangeTblEntry, but if it did, there'd be a problem.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-committers mailing list (pgsql-committers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-committers
