On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 10:17 AM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: >> On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 4:30 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >>> This really should have involved a catversion bump. But we just >>> had one earlier today, so in practice it might not matter. > >> Oh, because of stored rules using the old RangeTblEntry serialization >> format? Sorry, I totally missed that. > > Yeah, exactly. In practice I'm not sure a stored rule/view could contain > an RTE_NAMEDTUPLESTORE RangeTblEntry, but if it did, there'd be a problem.
I think that's not possible, so we're probably fine, even apart from the fact that we've bumped catversion multiple times since beta1. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-committers mailing list (pgsql-committers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-committers
