On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 3:21 PM, Jonathan S. Katz <jk...@postgresql.org> wrote:
> > On Apr 3, 2018, at 10:55 AM, Peter Eisentraut < > peter.eisentr...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > > On 4/3/18 09:12, Magnus Hagander wrote: > > I've pushed the fix and reloaded the 10 docs. I have not reloaded > earlier branches yet, but I'd be interested in some people reviewing a > bunch of pages in the 10 docs mainly to see if (1) it fixes all the > cases, and (2) it actually breaks some *other* cases. > > > It looks correct now. > > > +1 > > Did a spot check on known broken pages and chose some others at > random. Viewed the 9.6, 10, and devel versions. 10 and devel both > looked correct, and the 9.6 was broken where expected. > > The only thing I saw (and this may be something to look at the SGML > source) was some blocks that looked overly indented, but it was consistent > across all versions. On > > https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/queries-with.html > > If you search for "WITH RECURSIVE search_graph(id, link, data, depth)” > the expression in the CTE is much more indented than similar CTEs above > it. > > IMV I would not let this stop us from reloading the earlier versions as > that > indentation is consistent across all versions (including 9.6, where it has > the > initial indentation as well). > > I've reloaded docs back to 9.3. -- Magnus Hagander Me: https://www.hagander.net/ <http://www.hagander.net/> Work: https://www.redpill-linpro.com/ <http://www.redpill-linpro.com/>
