> On 26 Jun 2019, at 15:09, Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentr...@2ndquadrant.com> > wrote: > > On 2019-06-14 10:47, Daniel Gustafsson wrote: >> The warning about using ident for authorization or access control is using a >> <blockquote> with an <attribution> rather than a <warning>, making it look >> quite different from the rest of the manual, and less like a warning IMO. > > But this is a quote from the RFC. If you want to change it to a warning > box, then you also need to rephrase the surrounding text. But I don't > really see the need. It seems fine as it is.
It is indeed a quote, but to my reading/understanding the only reason we’ve included it is to act as a warning? Thats why the formatting stood out as it’s not consistent for warnings. The attached v2 instead wraps the quote in a <warning> with a slight rewording to make it even more prominent. cheers ./daniel
ident_warning-v2.patch
Description: Binary data
