Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentr...@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> In general, I would argue in favor of fewer "note", "warning", etc.
> Some documentation pages are now just a sequence of "note"s and little
> proper text. If the normal text properly explains a topic and its pros
> and cons, then we don't need all that extra decoration and it makes the
> text easier to read.
+1. With the way these things are rendered in the current HTML output,
they are so visually distracting that they ought to be reserved for
absolutely critical info. I almost feel that we should ban <note>
entirely, because the rendering is completely disproportional to the
meaning.
(Or, maybe, somebody could tinker with the stylesheets?)
regards, tom lane
