On Sun, Dec 8, 2019 at 3:51 AM Tatsuo Ishii <is...@sraoss.co.jp> wrote:
>
> > I wrote:
> >> Actually, that whole para could do with a rewrite; whoever wrote
> >> it was obviously not familiar with Strunk & White's dictum
> >> "Omit needless words".
> >
> > Looking closer, there were also some unnecessary inconsistencies with
> > the rest of the section, such as use of "records" rather than "rows",
> > and different markup choices.  I propose the attached ... it's
> > actually a bit longer than the original, but that's because it
> > offers more details.
>
> Thanks for looking into this. The patch looks much cleaner than
> before.

I agree this is way better!


Reply via email to