On Sat, Aug 22, 2020 at 12:05:24PM +0100, Robin Abbi wrote: > On Fri, 21 Aug 2020 at 23:52, Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> wrote: > > I developed the attached patach for this. Is this sufficient? > > > Would it be appropriate to consider including some language with a similar > information content to this > > " ... prior to PostgreSQL 11, these functions were unable to manage their > own transactions. PostgreSQL 11 adds SQL procedures that can perform full > transaction management within the body of a function, enabling developers > to create more advanced server-side applications, such as ones involving > incremental bulk data loading." > > from here https://www.postgresql.org/about/news/1894/ .
No, we would only mention it if there some kind of incompatibility here. We always have to balance adding text with making the text longer and harder to read. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> https://momjian.us EnterpriseDB https://enterprisedb.com The usefulness of a cup is in its emptiness, Bruce Lee
