Sorry. Execute permission for owner may have been on prior to chmod og-rwx . I thought that might be a problem and 600 eliminates that
> On Sep 26, 2020, at 9:29 AM, Magnus Hagander <mag...@hagander.net> wrote: > > > > >> On Sat, Sep 26, 2020 at 1:23 PM PG Doc comments form >> <nore...@postgresql.org> wrote: >> The following documentation comment has been logged on the website: >> >> Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/12/libpq-ssl.html >> Description: >> >> The instruction to use "chmod og-rwx" could leave the file with read >> permission set. Elsewhere the suggestion is "chmod 600". > > > Not sure what you mean here -- how could it leave it with read permission set? > > (Obviously it could for the owner, but 0600 also includes read permissions > for the owner) > > That said, it might be a good idea to be consistent since we seem to use a > mix of different styles of chmod. > > -- > Magnus Hagander > Me: https://www.hagander.net/ > Work: https://www.redpill-linpro.com/
