Rob Sargent <robjsarg...@gmail.com> writes:
> Sorry. Execute permission for owner may have been on prior to chmod og-rwx .
> I thought that might be a problem and 600 eliminates that
It seems highly unlikely that openssl would write the file with x
permission turned on. Even if it did, there's no particular
reason for us to insist on changing it.
>> That said, it might be a good idea to be consistent since we seem to use a
>> mix of different styles of chmod.
There is that. But I think the "og-rwx" style is more recommendable,
if we're going to try to standardize.
regards, tom lane
