Greetings, On Thu, Jul 1, 2021 at 21:57 Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 1, 2021 at 09:47:47PM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 1, 2021 at 21:35 Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> wrote: > > I normally link to only the _first_ mention of something, and since > they > > are both in the same section, I didn't add a link for the second one. > > Adding a second link might suggest that there is more information > > available, even though the coarseness of our links means that > section is > > the same. > > > > Perhaps the wording would be better as something like: > > > > New <a href=“…”>predefined roles</a> for granting access to read/write > all > > tables have been added, called pg_read_all_data and pg_write_all_data ..? > > > > Or something along those lines? > > I have avoided doing that since the link is about the roles, not about > the term "predefined roles". I tend to agree that it’s about the roles, but it isn’t about just one of them … > Just a thought. > > > > Perhaps another idea would be to make one link which includes both names. > > Uh, that is going to look odd, I am afraid. This thread started with the point that the current entry looks odd. I’m not sure this would look more odd than what is there now. Thanks, Stephen >
