>On Thu, Jul 1, 2021 at 10:01:46PM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote: >> > Just a thought. >> > >> > Perhaps another idea would be to make one link which includes both >>names. >> >> Uh, that is going to look odd, I am afraid. >> >> This thread started with the point that the current entry looks odd. I’m not >> sure this would look more odd than what is there now.
>If you look at the current doc version: > > https://momjian.us/pgsql_docs/release-14.html > >Notice that for these two items: > > Remove factorial operators ! and !! (Mark Dilger) > The factorial() function is still supported. Also remove function >numeric_fac(). > > Disallow factorial() of negative numbers (Peter Eisentraut) > Previously such cases returned 1. > >Only the first mention of "factorial()" uses a link; the second item >doesn't have any link. There are other places as well, like this on: "The postgres_fdw supports these type of scans if async_capable is set." async_capable is not a link. Or this one: "This speeds normalize() and IS NORMALIZED." I still think it should be more consistent and all should be links, even if they point to the same section. Regards Daniel
