On Wed, 2023-01-25 at 20:39 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > Laurenz Albe <laurenz.a...@cybertec.at> writes: > > On Wed, 2023-01-25 at 08:22 +0000, PG Doc comments form wrote: > > > Maybe this would be better? (I don't know the comma rules) > > > "because the files(,?) that are generated/processed by these tools(,?) are > > > already included in the tarball" > > > +1 > > > Correct English would be: > > > These tools are not needed to build from a distribution tarball, because > > the files generated by these tools are included in the tarball. > > The existing wording is not incorrect AFAICS, but I agree it's a bit > awkward.
I meant "a correct version of what was suggested in the mail", not that the released text was incorrect. > I'd modify one word in your version: > > These tools are not needed to build from a distribution tarball, because > the files generated using these tools are included in the tarball. > > Or possibly "with" instead of "using"? Both are better; I'd lean towards "with". Yours, Laurenz Albe