On Friday, June 6, 2025, Fujii Masao <masao.fu...@oss.nttdata.com> wrote:
> Hi, > > Since last_vacuum and vacuum_count in pg_stat_all_tables explicitly mention > that they don't include VACUUM FULL ("not counting VACUUM FULL"), I think > we should add the same clarification to the description of > total_vacuum_time. > This field also excludes VACUUM FULL, and without this note, users might > mistakenly think the time spent on VACUUM FULL is included. Thought? > > <structfield>total_vacuum_time</structfield> <type>double > precision</type> > </para> > <para> > - Total time this table has been manually vacuumed, in milliseconds. > + Total time this table has been manually vacuumed, in milliseconds > + (not counting <command>VACUUM FULL</command>). > (This includes the time spent sleeping due to cost-based delays.) > </para></entry> > </row> > Makes sense. Our naming this table rewrite vacuum full does confuse people into thinking it is related to vacuum. David J.