On 2025/06/13 21:09, Robert Treat wrote:
Well, I admit I mostly mentioned it because when I noticed this one wasn't documented the same way the other ones were, I second-guessed myself about if I knew how it really behaved and did a quick test to confirm :-) I suspect others might have similar confusion.
Maybe I failed to follow your point here... Are you suggesting it's worth mentioning that n_ins_since_vacuum doesn't count VACUUM FULL, to help avoid potential user confusion? If so, since n_ins_since_vacuum was introduced in v13, we'd need to backpatch that documentation change to v13? As for total_vacuum_time, since it's new in v18, I'd like to apply the proposed change there. Regards, -- Fujii Masao NTT DATA Japan Corporation
