Peter, Folks: > Since we have limited resources, I think it's OK that we concentrate on > working with the latest official standards version. And because the latest > standards version is modularized and has individual feature lists and > packages, it would be a lot easier for us to look good, and it would be > more useful for users to, say, specify a workable set of requirements for > their applications.
FWIW, there's two standards that application developers are concerned with as far as I can tell: SQL92, which is the "stable" standard that ensures cross-database compatibility (as well as the only standard that is readable) and SQL2003, which is the current standard and ensures buzzowrd-compliance as well as future prospects. -- Josh Berkus Aglio Database Solutions San Francisco ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 7: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
