Tom Lane wrote: > "Joshua D. Drake" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > There is only one current standard SQL:2003 correct? The rest are > > considered deprecated? > > The old ones are certainly not "deprecated". > > Personally I find the newer versions to be suffering from uncontrolled > feature bloat and committee-itis.
That was my feeling too. I know many cases the older specifications were clearer. Anyway, I think the new "There are three versions of the SQL standard" wording is OK. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org
