Jim Nasby wrote: > On Apr 12, 2007, at 7:54 AM, Jim Nasby wrote: > > Two questions: Why is pg_backend_pid documented with the stats > > functions (9.19 System Information Functions) seems more logical. > > > > Also, I can see mentioning the stats functions in the monitoring > > section, but shouldn't they actually be documented in with the rest > > of the functions? > > No comments? Does that mean if I write up a patch it'll be accepted?
Yea, I was wondering about that. I think the best idea would be to reference the backend functions from the main functions page, rather than move them. -- Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. + ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend
