On May 7, 2007, at 11:03 AM, Jim Nasby wrote:
On May 6, 2007, at 11:44 AM, Bruce Momjian wrote:Jim Nasby wrote:On Apr 12, 2007, at 7:54 AM, Jim Nasby wrote:Two questions: Why is pg_backend_pid documented with the stats functions (9.19 System Information Functions) seems more logical.Also, I can see mentioning the stats functions in the monitoring section, but shouldn't they actually be documented in with the rest of the functions?No comments? Does that mean if I write up a patch it'll be accepted?Yea, I was wondering about that. I think the best idea would be to reference the backend functions from the main functions page, rather than move them.Well, pg_backend_pid makes no sense being in with the stats functions, so I'll move it. I'll just include references to the other stuff.
Turns out it didn't really make much more sense to move pg_backend_pid either, so I went with Bruce's original idea.
monfunc.patch
Description: Binary data
-- Jim Nasby [EMAIL PROTECTED] EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com 512.569.9461 (cell)
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 7: You can help support the PostgreSQL project by donating at
http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
