On Fri, Oct 05, 2007 at 12:17:40PM -0700, Joshua D. Drake wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > David Fetter wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 05, 2007 at 11:43:45AM -0700, Joshua D. Drake wrote: > >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > >> Hash: SHA1 > >> > >> David Fetter wrote: > >>> On Fri, Oct 05, 2007 at 07:22:01PM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > >>>> Some of you may have noticed that there was a move proposed to > >>>> use "Postgres" alongside "PostgreSQL" as a product name in the > >>>> documentation and other written resources. A change along that > >>>> line has already been made in the FAQ. > >>>> > >>>> So I think what is being proposed is wrong and needs to be > >>>> reverted. > >>> That, or (my preference) make the change larger. I think it's > >>> significant that the vast majority of compatible software has some > >>> variant of Postgres and *not* PostgreSQL in the name. > >> I have seen no evidence of this. > > > > For evidence, take a look at the "Products" section of the Postgres > > Weekly News. > > I just read through all products sections in the PostgreSQL weekly news > from 07-22-07 to 09-30-07.
Nice job of careful cherry-picking, but I'm not buying it. Cheers, D -- David Fetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://fetter.org/ phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Skype: davidfetter Remember to vote! Consider donating to PostgreSQL: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
