On Fri, Oct 05, 2007 at 11:43:45AM -0700, Joshua D. Drake wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > David Fetter wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 05, 2007 at 07:22:01PM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > >> Some of you may have noticed that there was a move proposed to > >> use "Postgres" alongside "PostgreSQL" as a product name in the > >> documentation and other written resources. A change along that > >> line has already been made in the FAQ. > >> > > >> So I think what is being proposed is wrong and needs to be > >> reverted. > > > > That, or (my preference) make the change larger. I think it's > > significant that the vast majority of compatible software has some > > variant of Postgres and *not* PostgreSQL in the name. > > I have seen no evidence of this.
For evidence, take a look at the "Products" section of the Postgres Weekly News. Cheers, David. -- David Fetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://fetter.org/ phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Skype: davidfetter Remember to vote! Consider donating to PostgreSQL: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
