Bruce Momjian <[email protected]> writes:
> Euler Taveira de Oliveira wrote:
>> My English is not as good as yours but here is another try. Personally, I
>> prefer the second one but...
> Great, I used your second version. I had already done some of the ones
> you found, but you had many more. I also used your "0 disables" wording
> consistently in the file. Thanks for the help. Committed.
You know, it suddenly strikes me that this is going in largely the wrong
direction. Wasn't a key part of the reasoning for the GUC units support
to *eliminate* the need for people to know what the underlying
variable's unit is? I certainly think that putting the unit info into
the text descriptions is a seriously bad idea. It makes an already
overly wide view even wider, and the information is 100% redundant with
the "unit" column of the pg_settings view.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-docs mailing list ([email protected])
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-docs
