-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Steve Atkins wrote: > But choosing a > proprietary format that's only supported by a single tool, and > that renders to horrible quality PNGs is something we'll regret, > I think.
I think we should keep to the facts and you are not doing it here. Can you explain how you got to the conclusion that dia renders to horrible quality PNGs? Because this not what I and many have experienced when generating PNG files with dia. regards, - -- Rafael Martinez, <[email protected]> Center for Information Technology Services University of Oslo, Norway PGP Public Key: http://folk.uio.no/rafael/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkxC05sACgkQBhuKQurGihScPQCeKynNzLwvJx4KIrbzJ/+ADDeJ b7IAnA7e4MYA5gOXJ1ip5nTa0Yeou2PX =Onxk -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- Sent via pgsql-docs mailing list ([email protected]) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-docs
