Robert Haas wrote: > On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 8:46 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > > Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> writes: > >> Tom Lane wrote: > >>> Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> writes: > >>>> Perhaps we should allow any SVG file to be imported, but only allow > >>>> modifications by a single SVG editor. > > > >>> How is that sensible? ?The first change to the file will result in > >>> exactly the mass of cosmetic diffs that we wish to avoid. > > > >> I suggested this so we could get images into the docs and then only have > >> a single diff change once the file is modified. ?If we don't do that > >> then all image additions have to be done by someone with the proper > >> editor. > > > > Or at least, somebody passes it through the "proper editor" before > > committing. ?As long as said editor can read SVG output from a > > reasonable range of other tools, this doesn't seem that onerous. > > Bad news, Bruce: you're going to have to learn a new tool. :-)
Yes, I am sensing that. ;-) Do we have any agreement on which tool will be the definitive one? -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + It's impossible for everything to be true. + -- Sent via pgsql-docs mailing list (pgsql-docs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-docs
