On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 9:06 PM, Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> wrote: > Josh Kupershmidt wrote: >> I always assumed "PL/pgSQL" was correct, but does anyone know for >> sure? Anyone interested in making consistent all these mentions of >> PL/pgSQL in the source (I can send in a patch if needed)? > > Sure, it should be PL/pgSQL.
OK, here's a patch to fix. I tested with "make check" as src/test/regress/expected/plpgsql.out and src/test/regress/sql/plpgsql.sql are touched. Side note: The wiki page "Submitting a Patch": http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Submitting_a_Patch still talks about patch generation with cvs only, maybe someone who's more comfortable thank I am with the patch process wants to change this to talk about git? Josh
plpgsql_capitalization.patch
Description: Binary data
-- Sent via pgsql-docs mailing list (pgsql-docs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-docs
