On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 9:41 PM, Josh Kupershmidt <schmi...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 9:06 PM, Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> wrote: >> Josh Kupershmidt wrote: >>> I always assumed "PL/pgSQL" was correct, but does anyone know for >>> sure? Anyone interested in making consistent all these mentions of >>> PL/pgSQL in the source (I can send in a patch if needed)? >> >> Sure, it should be PL/pgSQL. > > OK, here's a patch to fix. I tested with "make check" as > src/test/regress/expected/plpgsql.out and > src/test/regress/sql/plpgsql.sql are touched.
Committed, except for the changes to the .po files, which I'm given to understand would just get overwritten by the next translation update anyway. Not back-patching, so as to avoid creating unnecessary work for translators. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise Postgres Company -- Sent via pgsql-docs mailing list (pgsql-docs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-docs
