Thom Brown <t...@linux.com> writes: > On 7 March 2011 23:30, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> Maybe we could say "the name or OID of a table", or some such phrase, >> so as to subtly avoid the expectation that what is being referred to >> is the datatype named "name"?
> Yes, that would remove the ambiguity. :) That wording turned out not to work well in context, at least not without major surgery on the containing sentences. I decided that the best way was to just say "specified table" in the function tables, and then borrow the paragraph that explains about regclass arguments from the sequence-functions page. http://git.postgresql.org/gitweb?p=postgresql.git;a=commitdiff;h=cfcdc99db67172d46a5e226375fa97e5c5a62267 regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-docs mailing list (pgsql-docs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-docs
